How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
No hidden linear relations in degree one
Statement
If a basis of is supplied, the linear map
is an isomorphism.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A Lie algebra with a specified totally ordered basis.
PBW makes the empty word and all length-one ordered words part of one basis of (Poincaré–Birkhoff–Witt theorem).
is spanned by words of length at most one (PBW filtration on the enveloping algebra).
Proof
By [L2], every element of is , so the displayed map is surjective.
By [L1], the empty PBW word and the length-one basis words are linearly independent. Therefore implies and every basis coefficient of is zero, so the map is injective.
The map is linear, injective, and surjective, hence is an isomorphism; for this reduces to the degree-zero map .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Etingof, MIT 18.745 notes, Theorem 13.1 and Corollary 13.3, printed pp. 74–75 (standard reference, not scraped)