How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The underlying ordinary category is change of base along the underlying-hom functor
Statement
The underlying ordinary category construction is the special case of change of base along the lax monoidal functor .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The change-of-base and underlying-category constructions.
Lax monoidal change of base extends to a 2-functor on enriched categories (Change of base extends to enriched functors and natural transformations as a 2-functor).
The underlying-category construction sends each hom-object to the set of global elements (The underlying-category construction is a 2-functor).
Proof
The hom-objects of the changed-base category along are exactly the sets , which are the hom-sets of in [L2].
The composition and identity maps are also the same ones: the lax structure on is induced by tensoring global elements and then composing in , which is exactly how [L2] defines composition and identities in the underlying category.
Therefore the underlying ordinary category is the change-of-base instance determined by .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Emily Riehl, Categorical Homotopy Theory, Remark 3.5.11 (standard reference, not scraped)