How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The trace map of a finite separable extension is surjective
Statement
If is a finite separable field extension, then the trace map
is surjective.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite separable extension .
The trace form is nondegenerate exactly when the extension is separable (The trace form of a finite extension is nondegenerate exactly when the extension is separable).
Proof
By [L1], the trace form of is nondegenerate. If the trace map itself were zero, then for every , so the vector would lie in the radical, contradicting nondegeneracy. Therefore the trace map is not the zero linear functional.
The image of an -linear map is an -subspace of the one-dimensional vector space . A nonzero subspace of is all of , so the trace map is surjective.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- B. Conrad, Norm and trace, Theorem 2.5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, Fields and Galois Theory, v5.10, Theorem 5.47 (standard reference, not scraped)