Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pending
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Asymptotically mean stationary sources

Definition

Consider a measurable alphabet (A,B), a probability law P on AZ with its product sigma-algebra, and the measurable left shift T(x)j=xj+1.

The law P is asymptotically mean stationary (AMS) when for every measurable event E the limit Pˉ(E)=lim⁡N→∞1N∑j=0N−1P(T−jE) exists and the resulting set function is a probability measure.

The resulting law Pˉ is called the stationary mean when it is invariant under T, in the sense of Measure-preserving transformations and systems. If E is strictly shift invariant, then each summand P(T−jE)=P(E); hence P(E)=Pˉ(E). Tail events are handled by the separate domination lemma, not by this invariant-event identity.

Call the AMS source ergodic when its stationary mean Pˉ is ergodic as a measure-preserving system under the same shift. This uses Ergodicity relative to an invariant measure and is a property of the mean, not a claim that P itself is stationary. For finite discrete alphabets these conventions agree with Finite-alphabet stationary source.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A measurable alphabet (A,B), a law P on its two-sided product space, and the left shift T.

[F1]

Measure-preserving transformations and systems: a probability law is invariant under a measurable shift exactly when P(T−1E)=P(E) for every measurable event E.

[F2]

Ergodicity relative to an invariant measure: ergodicity of a probability-preserving system means that every strictly invariant measurable event has probability zero or one.

Proof

Given: The law, shift, and product sigma-algebra.

1.1givenalgebra

Inverse images of product cylinders under T are product cylinders; since these generate the product sigma-algebra, T is measurable. The law P is asymptotically mean stationary (AMS) when for every measurable event E the limit Pˉ(E)=lim⁡N→∞1N∑j=0N−1P(T−jE) exists and the resulting set function is a probability measure.

2.1givenstep 1.1F1algebra

For each measurable E, the Ces`aro averages for T−1E and E differ by 1N∑j=0N−1P(T−(j+1)E)−1N∑j=0N−1P(T−jE)=P(T−NE)−P(E)N. The numerator has absolute value at most 1, so its quotient tends to zero. Taking limits, which exist by step 1.1 for both events, gives Pˉ(T−1E)=Pˉ(E). Thus the Ces`aro limit is stationary in the sense of [F1].

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1algebra

The resulting law Pˉ is called the stationary mean when it is stationary in the sense of [F1]. If E is strictly shift invariant, then each summand P(T−jE)=P(E); hence P(E)=Pˉ(E). Tail events are handled by the separate domination lemma, not by this invariant-event identity.

4.1F2step 3.1algebra∎

Call the AMS source ergodic when its stationary mean Pˉ is ergodic as a measure-preserving system under the same shift. This is a property of the mean, not a claim that P itself is stationary.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources