How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Antichains, chain covers, and antichain covers of a poset
Definition
Let be a poset (Partial order and partially ordered set).
An antichain is a subset whose distinct elements are incomparable. Thus and imply that neither nor . An antichain is maximal if it is contained in no larger antichain, and maximum if its cardinality is at least that of every antichain in . These notions are different: maximal refers to inclusion, whereas maximum refers to cardinality.
A chain cover of is a family of chains (Chain in a poset) with . An antichain cover is a family of antichains with . A cover may have overlapping members. For a finite cover, order its members, assign each point to the first member that contains it, and delete it from the others. This produces a partition into no more chains, or no more antichains, so minimum cover numbers are unchanged if partitions are required.
Depends on
Used by
- A symmetric chain decomposition gives a second proof of Sperner's bound Corollary
- A maximal antichain of size one in a finite poset of width two Counterexample
- Height and width of a nonempty finite poset Definition
- False: every maximal antichain in a finite poset has maximum cardinality False statement
- A maximal antichain splits a finite poset into its down-set and up-set with the antichain as their intersection Lemma
- Lubell-Yamamoto-Meshalkin inequality for antichains in a Boolean lattice Theorem
- Mirsky's theorem: the minimum number of antichains covering a finite poset equals its height Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 2 results over 2 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- M. Keller and W. T. Trotter, Applied Combinatorics, §6.4 (standard reference, not scraped)