How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Coherent action of a group on a category
Definition
Setting. Let be a group and let be a category (Category, object, morphism, domain, codomain, identity, composition, and hom-collection); write for the strict monoidal category of endofunctors of and natural transformations between them, with composition of functors as its product (Covariant functor, identity functor, composite functor, and contravariant functor, Natural isomorphism). Composition of endofunctors is strictly associative and its unit is , so no associator constraint of enters anything below.
Data. A coherent action of on consists of:
- a functor for every , with ;
- for all a chosen natural isomorphism ;
- a chosen natural isomorphism , i.e. (since ) a natural automorphism of the identity functor.
Pentagon. For all the two composites agree: where is the whiskered natural transformation with components and the one with components .
Unit triangles. For all , Here has components , while has components . Since is the identity functor, these are natural transformations and , respectively. They need not agree: for a general natural automorphism of , naturality does not imply , whose components are and . The two equalities are the left and right unit axioms for a monoidal functor with unit constraint and the discrete monoidal structure on .
Relation to a weak action. The underlying functors form a weak action of on in the sense of Weak action of a group on a category: the chosen in particular exhibit isomorphisms for all . The converse does not hold: a weak action records no chosen compositors and imposes no pentagon, and a coherent action is precisely a weak action equipped with chosen compositors and a chosen unit satisfying the pentagon and the two unit triangles above. The pentagon is part of the data; it is not a formal consequence of the existence of isomorphisms .
Rouquier's instance. In the application of this page, . For , the functor is left tensoring by the invertible object of Rouquier's rigidification; set and use the canonical unit identification for the empty-word object . The isomorphisms are induced by the unique maps compatible with the canonical comparisons of Canonical comparisons between standard graph tensor products in the derived category, with the canonical tensor unit identifications when an index or product is . The map corresponds, under the unit identification, to . Rouquier's construction produces the pentagon and unit triangles by lifting associative graph multiplication together with the additive internal shifts of signed words: in this normalization the derived models are the pullback of the strict action along , where is the permutation projection and the signed word exponent; the lifts are fixed by localization isomorphisms and normalized uniqueness. The definitions make sense for an arbitrary group and category, and no Hecke algebra enters.
Degenerate cases. If is the trivial group then and the data reduce to natural automorphisms and of . The unit axioms give ; with this value the pentagon is automatic. Thus a coherent action of the trivial group may still have any invertible natural automorphism as its unit; taking gives the identity example. If is the one-object category attached to a monoid then the definition reduces to the usual coherence data on that monoid. For a -linear category, an invertible scalar multiple of the identity is a natural automorphism, so need not be the identity. Once the compositors are fixed, however, the unit triangle at forces .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Raphaël Rouquier, Categorification of the braid groups, arXiv:math/0409593v1 (30 September 2004), §3 "The 2-braid group" (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ben Elias and Daniel Krasner, Rouquier complexes are functorial over braid cobordisms, arXiv:0906.4761v3, §2.5 and §3 (standard reference, not scraped)