How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Compactly supported singular cohomology
Definition
Let be a locally compact Hausdorff space, and let be an abelian group, or an -module if an -module structure is desired. Its compactly supported singular cohomology is The relative groups use Relative singular cochain complex. If , the identity map of pairs induces the transition from the group to the group. Concretely, a cochain vanishing on all simplices outside also vanishes on all simplices outside , so this transition is induced by inclusion of relative cochain complexes. The positive coboundary is the same in both, so the inclusion descends to cohomology. Identities and successive transitions compose literally on cochains.
The index is a set, being a subcollection of . It contains , and is compact: an open cover restricts to a cover of each of , and the union of their two finite subcovers covers the union. As a poset, it has at most one arrow between any two objects. It therefore satisfies the three filtered-category conditions in Filtered categories and filtered colimits.
Here is an explicit construction, including existence of the colimit. Represent an element by with . Declare if some compact makes their transition images equal. Reflexivity uses , symmetry uses the same , and transitivity uses the union of two witnessing compact sets and composition of transitions. On equivalence classes, define addition by sending both representatives to and adding there; define negation and, when applicable, scalar multiplication on representatives. If representatives are changed, pass all of the finitely many comparison witnesses to their compact union. The transitioned elements then agree, and additivity of the transition maps proves the result independent of representatives. All abelian-group or module laws hold after this passage to one common group. The class of is the zero element.
The maps form a cocone. Given any compatible family of homomorphisms from the relative groups to a group or module , define the map on a class to be the image of under the homomorphism. Compatibility proves it constant on the displayed equivalence relation; every class has a representative, so this is the unique induced homomorphism. This is precisely the colimit universal property. In particular exactly when the image of vanishes at some larger compact support, and two representatives are equal exactly by the common-support test already given.
For compact , the index is terminal. Sending to the transition image in is inverse to the map from this terminal group, since each representative is equivalent to its image there. Thus canonically, including the one-point and empty spaces. For , every relative group is zero. Zero coefficients and negative degrees also give zero groups by the relative-cochain conventions.
The local compactness hypothesis gives a useful cofinal family of supports: In a locally compact Hausdorff space every point has a neighbourhood base of compact sets, every open subspace and every closed subspace is locally compact, every open set around a point contains an open set with compact closure inside it, and every compact set sits inside an open set with compact closure puts every compact inside an open with compact closure. Thus supports that are closures of relatively compact open sets suffice. The explicit common-support test proves this replacement has the same colimit: every original representative moves to such a support, and any equality witness can be enlarged to another such support. This does not require selecting a neighborhood for every compact set simultaneously. All constructions above are choice-free.
Depends on
- Relative singular cochain complex
- Filtered categories and filtered colimits
- In a locally compact Hausdorff space every point has a neighbourhood base of compact sets, every open subspace and every closed subspace is locally compact, every open set around a point contains an open set with compact closure inside it, and every compact set sits inside an open set with compact closure
Used by
- The cap-duality map of an oriented manifold Definition
- A manifold exhaustion passes duality to the colimit Lemma
- Cap duality for open subsets of Euclidean space Lemma
- Cap duality on a Euclidean coordinate ball Lemma
- Cap duality passes to increasing open unions Lemma
- Cap product and the Mayer–Vietoris duality ladder Lemma
- Duality extends to finite unions of coordinate balls Lemma
- Alexander duality for compact locally contractible subsets of a sphere Theorem
- Poincaré duality for oriented topological manifolds Theorem
- Poincaré–Lefschetz duality Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, §3.3, pp.242–243 (standard reference, not scraped)
- May, A Concise Course in Algebraic Topology, Chapter 20 §5 (standard reference, not scraped)