How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Constant diagrams, cones, cocones, and their morphisms
Definition
Let and be categories and let . The constant diagram at is the functor that sends every object to and every morphism to (Covariant functor, identity functor, composite functor, and contravariant functor).
For a diagram (Diagram as a functor from an indexing category), a cone over with apex is a natural transformation (Natural transformation and its components). Thus it is a family satisfying
A morphism of cones is a morphism such that for every . Cones and their morphisms form the category .
Dually, a cocone under with apex is a natural transformation , so . A morphism of cocones is a morphism satisfying for every . These form .
Depends on
Used by
- Limits and colimits as terminal cones and initial cocones, with existence and uniqueness in their universal properties Definition
- Wedges and cowedges, and the categories they form Definition
- The end of a functor made mute in its contravariant variable is the ordinary limit of that functor Proposition
- A weighted limit is an ordinary limit over the category of elements of the weight, and a weighted colimit an ordinary colimit over it Theorem
- An end is a limit over the twisted arrow category, and a coend is a colimit over its opposite Theorem
- Comma-category limit and colimit formulae compute Kan extensions Theorem
- Weighting by the constant singleton gives exactly the ordinary limit Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- E. Riehl, Category Theory in Context, Definitions 3.1.1 and 3.1.5 (standard reference, not scraped)