How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
convergence for random variables
Definition
Let . For real random variables whose classes lie in as defined by The space as the quotient by null functions, write in when For , this norm is for , it is the essential-supremum norm. Thus the assertion concerns almost-everywhere equivalence classes, not chosen representatives.
Depends on
Used by
- Almost-sure convergence need not imply Lᵖ convergence Counterexample
- Convergence in probability need not imply Lᵖ convergence Counterexample
- Lᵖ convergence need not imply almost-sure convergence Counterexample
- Lᵖ convergence need not imply L^q convergence when p<q Counterexample
- Dominated convergence in Lᵖ Theorem
- L^q convergence implies Lᵖ convergence on a probability space Theorem
- L¹ convergence implies uniform integrability Theorem
- Lᵖ convergence implies convergence in probability Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- S. Roch, Lecture 3: Modes of convergence, Definition 3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)