How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Deterministic finite automata
Definition
Let be an alphabet. A deterministic finite automaton over is a quintuple such that:
- is a finite set of states.
- is the start state.
- is the set of accepting states.
- is a total transition function in the sense of A function is a relation with and implying ; , the value , domain and codomain, with domain exactly the Cartesian product of The Cartesian product .
The adjective "deterministic" means that for each pair there is exactly one next state , and "finite" means that has finite cardinality in the sense of The cardinality of a finite set.
Remarks
-
A transition diagram that omits a letter from some state does not yet specify a DFA, because totality of is part of the definition.
-
The ambient alphabet is part of the data. The same directed graph can define different automata if the chosen alphabet changes.
Depends on
- Computation alphabets, words, the empty word, and $\Sigma^*$
- A function is a relation $f$ with $(a,b) \in f$ and $(a,c) \in f$ implying $b = c$; $f : A \to B$, the value $f(a)$, domain and codomain
- The cardinality $\lvert A\rvert$ of a finite set
- The Cartesian product $A \times B := \{\, z \in \mathcal{P}(\mathcal{P}(A \cup B)) : \exists a \in A\ \exists b \in B\ z = (a,b) \,\}$
Used by
- A missing `1`-transition shows the drawn machine is not yet a DFA Counterexample
- The extended transition function of a DFA Definition
- FALSE: a DFA transition diagram may omit a sink without changing totality False statement
- FALSE: complementing a DFA complements its transition graph False statement
- The published prefix automata extend canonically to DFAs for factor-avoidance languages Proposition
- Complementing the accepting states complements the recognized language Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jean Gallier and Jocelyn Quaintance, Introduction to the Theory of Computation: Some Notes for CIS511 (standard reference, not scraped)
- John Watrous, Introduction to the Theory of Computing, Lecture 2 (standard reference, not scraped)