How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The direct-sum total complex on finite diagonals
Definition
For the first-quadrant Hom bicomplex , put Each diagonal has precisely possible bidegrees, so this direct sum is finite. Consequently there is no choice here between direct-sum and product totalisations.
Depends on
Used by
- The Hom double complex in low bidegrees Example
- FALSE: double-complex totalisation is unambiguous with infinite diagonals False statement
- Acyclic assembly by exact columns Lemma
- Acyclic assembly by exact rows Lemma
- Projective and injective constructions of Ext agree for supplied resolutions Theorem
- The bar cochain complex computes group cohomology Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Chapter 2 (standard reference, not scraped)