How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Elliptic function for a lattice
Definition
Let be a full complex lattice and let , , be the quotient map (Complex lattice and quotient torus), so that is a compact Riemann surface and is a holomorphic covering map (The quotient is a compact Riemann surface).
A -elliptic function is a meromorphic function on the plane (Meromorphic functions on a plane domain, the Riemann-sphere convention of Holomorphic maps and meromorphic functions on Riemann surfaces) satisfying the periodicity condition
where both sides are values in : the equation is allowed, and it is required that is a pole exactly when is, with the same -value . Equivalently, is the pullback
of a meromorphic function on the Riemann surface ; since is surjective such a is unique, and changing a representative of a class changes by an element of , under which is invariant by periodicity. The functions and are called the torus form and the plane form of the same elliptic function.
The period group of a meromorphic is
it is a subgroup of , and is -elliptic exactly when . The period group need not equal : if is a lattice containing then every -elliptic function is -elliptic, so the same function can be elliptic for several lattices.
Remarks
Descent and compatibility. If is -elliptic, the formula is well defined because a different representative is , and the local expressions of in the quotient charts are local expressions of , which are holomorphic or have a pole; since is a covering map, every point of has a chart inverse to a bijective restriction of , so is holomorphic as a map away from the image of the poles and has poles there. Conversely is -periodic, and and are mutually inverse, so the two descriptions coincide.
Field structure. Sums, products, quotients with denominator not identically zero and constant multiples of -elliptic functions are again -elliptic, and the -elliptic functions form a subfield of the field of all meromorphic functions on (Meromorphic functions on a connected plane domain form a field); equivalently they are the meromorphic functions on the compact torus . Constants are elliptic, and they are the only -elliptic functions with no poles: a holomorphic (pole-free) -periodic function is bounded on the compact fundamental domain and hence constant, by Liouville's theorem. This last statement is proved with the divisor laws in the next items of the page.
Zeros and poles. For a -elliptic function , its zeros and poles are -invariant: shows that is a zero or pole of a given order exactly when is. Since their classes form closed, isolated subsets of the compact torus , only finitely many classes of zeros and poles occur; this finiteness is used when the divisor of a nonzero elliptic function is formed. The allowed zero function has every point as a zero and has no divisor of isolated zeros.
Depends on
Used by
- Moving the boundary of a fundamental parallelogram Example
- Degree two of ℘ and its four branch points Lemma
- Divisor and residue laws for elliptic functions Theorem
- Normal convergence, parity and periodicity of the Weierstrass p function Theorem
- The field of elliptic functions is generated by ℘ and ℘' Theorem
- The torus is biholomorphic to its Weierstrass cubic Theorem
- Weierstrass cubic differential equation Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Modular Functions and Modular Forms, Ch. 3, pp. 41-47 (standard reference, not scraped)
- C. T. McMullen, Advanced Complex Analysis, Math 213a course notes, Ch. 5 §5.1, pp. 79-90 (standard reference, not scraped)
- NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, §23.2, equations 23.2.1-23.2.17 (standard reference, not scraped)