How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite feedforward computation graphs and layered MLPs
Definition
Fix integers . A finite feedforward computation graph from to consists of a finite directed graph with no directed cycle; pairwise disjoint input, hidden, and output vertex sets whose union is ; exactly input vertices and output vertices; and a specified ordering of in which the tail of every directed edge precedes its head. The input vertices are labelled bijectively by the coordinates , and input vertex has value for . Each non-input vertex has a real bias , a real weight for every edge , and a real activation function . In the specified order, its value is
The network output is the vector of values at . A layered multilayer perceptron is the specialization with layers , where , , and every edge goes from to for some ; the hidden vertices use a shared activation and the output vertices use the identity activation. A fully connected layered perceptron includes every edge between consecutive layers. The fixed ordering makes the recursive evaluation unambiguous and is part of the graph data.
The diagram shows the edge direction and evaluation convention for a fully connected scalar-output perceptron with one hidden layer. Each circle is one scalar-valued node; the hidden nodes apply and the output node is linear. The diagram illustrates the definition and is not used in any proof.
diagram failed to render:
\begin{tikzpicture}[>=stealth, node distance=1.5cm]
\node[draw,circle] (x1) {$x_1$};
\node[draw,circle,below of=x1] (x2) {$x_2$};
\node[draw,circle,right of=x1,yshift=-0.35cm] (h1) {$\sigma$};
\node[draw,circle,below of=h1] (h2) {$\sigma$};
\node[draw,circle,right of=h1,yshift=-0.35cm] (y) {$y$};
\draw[->] (x1) -- (h1);
\draw[->] (x1) -- (h2);
\draw[->] (x2) -- (h1);
\draw[->] (x2) -- (h2);
\draw[->] (h1) -- (y);
\draw[->] (h2) -- (y);
\end{tikzpicture}Used by
- Masked autoencoder pretraining Algorithm
- Rectifier variance-preserving initialization Algorithm
- Activation classes for neural-operator universality Definition
- Fully connected and residual networks with the Du Gram kernel Definition
- Hard and soft attention sequence models Definition
- Homogeneous classifier margins and exponential training risk Definition
- Low-rank adaptation of a linear layer Definition
- Neural operator between function spaces Definition
- Reconstruction autoencoder and denoising risk Definition
- ReLU feedforward networks and complexity conventions Definition
- Single-hidden-layer network realization Definition
- Symmetric image-text contrastive loss Definition
- Transformer encoder, decoder, and fixed-width expressivity blocks Definition
- A compressed classifier can differ from its trained predictor off the sample Example
- A homogeneous-network KKT point that is not globally optimal Example
- A normalized-pixel objective with a constant representation Example
- Backpropagation through a two-layer network with a shared weight Example
- ReLU backward gradient-variance recurrence Theorem
- ReLU forward preactivation-variance recurrence Theorem
Dependency tree · 0 levels
Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.
Sources
- Leshno, Lin, Pinkus, and Schocken, Multilayer Feedforward Networks With a Non-Polynomial Activation Function Can Approximate Any Function, §2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Goodfellow, Bengio, and Courville, Deep Learning, §6.4.1 (standard reference, not scraped)