Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite-alphabet conditional entropy given an observation

Definition

Let X take values in a finite nonempty set S and let Y take values in a standard-Borel space (T,T). Let K:T⇝S be a conditional law of X given Y, so that K(Y,⋅) is a regular conditional distribution given σ(Y). Define H(X∣Y):=∫T(−∑x∈SK(y,{x})ln⁡K(y,{x}))PY(dy), with 0ln⁡0:=0 and natural logarithms. The finite entropy convention is that of Finite distributions, entropy, divergence, and stochastic matrices. Each evaluation y↦K(y,{x}) is measurable. The explicit argument in Kullback–Leibler divergence proves −tln⁡t extends continuously to zero and is bounded by 1/e on [0,1]; hence the finite entropy integrand is measurable and bounded by ∣S∣/e. The result is independent of the supplied version without a choice axiom: the finite supplied singleton family {{x}:x∈S} determines probability measures on S by finite additivity. Apply the supplied-determining-family argument in Conditional law given a random element to two supplied kernels K,L. Outside the finite union of their singleton-evaluation discrepancy sets, which is a measurable PY-null set, all probabilities K(y,{x}) and L(y,{x}) agree. Their entropy integrands therefore agree almost everywhere, proving equality of the integrals. This uses supplied kernels, not a theorem asserting their existence.

This definition permits a non-finite observation Y; only the target alphabet S is finite. If Y is finite, then for each positive-mass y the conditional-law identity gives K(y,{x})PY({y})=P(X=x,Y=y), so K(y,{x})=pX∣y(x). Evaluating the integral as a finite weighted sum therefore gives exactly the convention of Finite conditional entropy, by Expectation agrees with the published finite weighted sum.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

50 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources