How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite-window Gibbs density relative to a Poisson reference
Definition
Let and be as in Finite-window spatial observations and configurations, and let be a specified finite-window Poisson probability measure on that space. For each parameter , let be a measurable admissible support and let be measurable. Extend the weight by zero off : on and elsewhere. Put Only when do these data define the finite-window Gibbs law, with density The support and normalizer are part of the model specification. No general existence, mixing, consistency, or asymptotic result is included in this definition.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Adrian Baddeley, Spatial Point Processes and their Applications, complete lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Günter Last and Mathew Penrose, Lectures on the Poisson Process, author-hosted 2017 version (standard reference, not scraped)