Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Flegal–Jones overlapping-batch size conditions

Definition

Let δ>0 and let (bn)n≥2 be positive integers. Say that the sequence satisfies the Flegal–Jones OBM batch-size conditions for exponent δ, with the integer monotonicity correction described below, when bn<n for all sufficiently large n, bn→∞, n/bn→∞, and there is a constant c≥1 such that ∑n=2∞(bn/n)c<∞, while bnnlog⁡n→0,n2/(2+δ)(log⁡n)3bn→0, there are n0≥2 and c1<∞ with log⁡n/bn≤c1 for all n≥n0, and bn2n−2log⁡log⁡n→0,bn4n−3log⁡log⁡n→0.

These are all the numerical rate, summability and endpoint hypotheses of Flegal–Jones Theorem 2. The source additionally asks that both bn and n/bn be nondecreasing. Those two requirements are omitted here: for an integer sequence with bn<n eventually they are incompatible with bn→∞. Indeed, ratio monotonicity would imply n(bn+1−bn)≤bn<n, while integer monotonicity would force the nonnegative integer bn+1−bn to be zero. Thus the literal source conditions would make bn eventually constant. The corrected interface preserves the intended floor-power batch sequences, and the Brownian quadratic-form proof of OBM consistency needs neither monotonicity assumption.

This is a sufficient-condition interface; failure of a condition does not imply inconsistency of the estimator.

For the floor-power sequence bn=⌊nν⌋, the intended source range δ>2/3 and 2/(2+δ)<ν<3/4 satisfies this corrected contract. Indeed, eventually nν/2≤bn≤nν. Choose c>max⁡{1,1/(1−ν)} to bound the summability series by ∑nn−c(1−ν)<∞. The other displayed quantities are bounded respectively by nν−1log⁡n, 2n2/(2+δ)−ν(log⁡n)3, 2n−νlog⁡n, n2ν−2log⁡log⁡n and n4ν−3log⁡log⁡n, all tending to zero. Also bn→∞, n/bn→∞ and bn<n eventually. These checks establish the numerical contract without asserting the impossible simultaneous monotonicity.

Used by

Dependency tree · 0 levels

Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.

Sources