Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Hg toolkit hyperbolic group and stable length

Definition

Fix a group G with a specified finite generating set S, in the sense of Finitely generated groups, and the word metric of The word metric of a group with respect to a generating set. Use the unit-edge geometric Cayley realization: take vertices G and unoriented labelled edges from g to gs for the generators, identifying an edge with its reversal. Parallel edges and loops, if present, are retained. Its path metric restricts to the word metric on vertices.

The standing hyperbolic-group hypothesis is that this specified geodesic realization has δ-slim triangles, for some specified δ0, in the sense of Hg toolkit slim triangles products and four point constants. Independence of generating set is not assumed here. A group is elementary if it is finite or virtually cyclic; virtually cyclic means it has a cyclic subgroup with finitely many left cosets.

For gG, its stable translation length in this generating set is τS(g)=limngnSn=infk1gkSk. The following argument proves existence, without hyperbolicity or AC.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: G,S,g as above; all lengths below are with respect to S.

[F2]

Word length is finite, subadditive, invariant under inversion and vanishes at the identity by Word length is defined on every element and satisfies the subadditivity, inversion and vanishing laws.

[F3]

Every nonempty bounded-below set of real numbers has an infimum by Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property).

Proof

1.1

For completeness, the realization is geodesic as asserted in the definition. For two interior-edge points, any finite edge route either stays on their common edge, when there is one, or first reaches one of the at most two endpoints of the first edge and finally leaves one of the endpoints of the last edge. Between those vertices its length is at least their word distance. Conversely each of these at most four endpoint routes is attained by a shortest word, with the specified initial and final partial edges. Include the direct same-edge interval as another candidate. The minimum of this finite list is attained and positive for distinct points; it defines the path metric. Concatenation gives the triangle inequality. A minimizing route, parametrized by length, is isometric, since a shorter route between two of its points would shorten it. At vertices the same argument gives exactly word distance. Loops are covered by the two ends of their interval before identification; coincident endpoints cause no problem.

F2given
1.2

Put an=gn and a0=0. Then 0an+man+am, so the nonempty set {ak/k:k1} is bounded below by zero. Its infimum t exists and satisfies 0ta1.

F1F2F3
2.1

Fix η>0. By the defining property of the infimum there is a positive integer k such that ak/k<t+η/2. For each n1 write n=qk+r, 0r<k. Repeated subadditivity gives anqak+ar. With C=max0r<kar, it follows that tan/nak/k+C/n. Here q/n1/k and ak0 justify the last inequality.

step 1.2algebra
3.1

For all sufficiently large n, C/n<η/2, giving tan/n<t+η. The requisite large integers exist in a real complete ordered field: if the natural numbers had a finite supremum u, some natural m>u1 would give m+1>u, a contradiction. Thus an/nt. This also treats C=0 and k=1 directly. If g=e, every an and t is zero; if g has finite order m, am=0 gives t=0. Only one witness k for a given tolerance and finitely many endpoint routes were used, so no AC is needed.

step 2.1F3F2algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources