Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The formal Bernstein presentation for a reduced based root datum

Definition

Let R=(X,Φ,Y,Φ∨,Δ) be as in Abstract root data and their Weyl groups, with finite Weyl group W0. Use the finite simple-reflection set S0={sα:α∈Δ} specified in The Iwahori–Matsumoto affine Hecke algebra of a based root datum, where S0 generates W0 and is contained in Saff. For s,t∈S0, let m(s,t) be the order of st in W0, which is finite because W0 is finite. The group algebra C[Y] is the complex vector space with basis {θy:y∈Y} and multiplication θyθz=θy+z; its identity is θ0. The simple reflection corresponding to α∈Δ acts on Y by sα(y)=y−⟨α,y⟩α∨.

Write 2X={2x:x∈X}. For each simple root α∈Δ∩2X, also supply a positive scalar vα′; it is the second parameter in the doubled-root rank-one Bernstein relation. This additional scalar is formal input to the presentation. To compare this presentation with a specified HIM(R,q), its parameters must be attached: require vα′=v(Hα,1), where v(H) is the positive square root of the parameter of its wall reflection, well defined by Canonical affine geometry and wall parameters of a root datum. The finite parameter is already vα=v(Hα,0). Without this tie one is defining a formal Bernstein algebra, not asserting comparison with the fixed q. When α∉2X, no second parameter is used; the wall-parameter lemma proves the two wall classes have equal parameters.

Define the formal Bernstein algebra B(R,v,v′) as the quotient of the free associative C-algebra on {θy:y∈Y} and {Ns:s∈S0} by θ0=1, θyθz=θy+z for y,z∈Y, the finite Hecke relations, and the following cross-relation for each α∈Δ and y∈Y. Here vα:=vsα=qsα>0 from The Iwahori–Matsumoto affine Hecke algebra of a based root datum, and the finite Hecke relations are (Ns−vs)(Ns+vs−1)=0 for s∈S0 and equality of the alternating products of Ns,Nt of length m(s,t) for distinct s,t∈S0 (Universal parameters, the generic Coxeter Hecke algebra and generator conjugacy):

θyNsα−Nsαθsα(y)={(vα−vα−1)θy−θsα(y)1−θ−α∨,α∉2X,((vα−vα−1)+θ−α∨(vα′−(vα′)−1))θy−θsα(y)1−θ−2α∨,α∈2X.

The quotients are interpreted in C[Y]; their well-definedness is proved in The Bernstein cross-relation quotients are Laurent polynomials ↗. The quotient construction defines an associative algebra. It does not assert that B(R,v,v′) is nonzero, has a PBW basis, or is isomorphic to the Iwahori–Matsumoto algebra of The Iwahori–Matsumoto affine Hecke algebra of a based root datum.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources