Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Margin-preserving compression of score classifiers

Definition

Let (X,ΣX) be a nonempty measurable instance space, let Y={1,…,K} have its discrete sigma-algebra with K≥2, and equip X×Y and its finite powers with their product sigma-algebras. Let P be a probability law on X×Y. For an integer m≥1, write a sample as S=((X1,Y1),…,(Xm,Ym)). A score map u=(u1,…,uK):X→RK is coordinatewise measurable when each uk:(X,ΣX)→(R,B(R)) is measurable. Define its classifier by the least-index tie rule

hu(x):=min⁡{k∈Y:uk(x)=max⁡j∈Yuj(x)}

and its margin on label y by

Mu(x,y):=uy(x)−max⁡j∈Y, j≠yuj(x).

For each k∈Y, {x:hu(x)=k}=⋂j<k{x:uk(x)>uj(x)}∩⋂j>k{x:uk(x)≥uj(x)}, and each comparison set is measurable; an intersection over no indices means X. Since Y is finite, Mu is measurable on X×Y as well. The population zero-one risk is RP(hu):=P{(x,y):hu(x)≠y}. For a sample S of length m and γ≥0, the empirical margin loss is L^γ(u;S):=1m∑i=1m1{Mu(Xi,Yi)≤γ}. The event defining RP(hu) is measurable by measurability of hu.

Fix integers q≥0 and r≥1. A fixed-helper finite parameter codebook consists of a helper string s fixed independently of the sample, finite nonempty sets D1,…,Dq with ∣Dj∣≤r, a nonempty code set A⊆∏j=1qDj, and one coordinatewise measurable decoder score map gs,a:X→RK for each a∈A. For q=0, the empty product is the singleton containing the empty tuple. The codebook and all its decoders are fixed independently of the sample, so ∣A∣≤rq.

Let F:(X×Y)m×X→RK be measurable for the product sigma-algebra on its domain and the Borel sigma-algebra on RK. Let α:(X×Y)m→A be measurable, where A has its discrete sigma-algebra, and write fS(x):=F(S,x). For ϵ>0, the sample-dependent trained score map fS is ϵ-compressible by this codebook on a sample S if max⁡k∈Y∣fS(Xi)k−gs,α(S)(Xi)k∣≤ϵ(1≤i≤m). The code α(S) may depend on S; the helper string, codebook, and decoders remain fixed independently of the sample.

Definition references

Measurable spaces and measurable sets: a measurable space consists of a set equipped with a sigma-algebra.

Supervised prediction problems: supplies measurable instance and label spaces, a joint probability law, measurable predictors, and a measurable loss.

Population and empirical risk: population risk is the nonnegative integral of the loss, and empirical risk is its finite sample average.

A measurable function between measurable spaces: measurability is the preimage condition.

The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates: finite product sigma-algebras are generated recursively by measurable rectangles.

Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined: finite maxima and arithmetic combinations of measurable real-valued functions are measurable.

Arora et al., §2, Definitions 1–2: score closeness on training inputs with a finite code family and a helper fixed before sampling.

Shalev-Shwartz and Ben-David, Chapter 4 §4.2: finite measurable hypothesis classes and empirical/population zero-one risk conventions.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The measurable space (X,ΣX), the finite discrete label space Y, the product sigma-algebras, the law P, and a coordinatewise measurable score map u.

[F1]

Finite maxima and arithmetic combinations of measurable real-valued functions are measurable. Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined

[F2]

A map is measurable when preimages of measurable sets are measurable. A measurable function between measurable spaces

[F3]

The product sigma-algebra is generated by measurable rectangles, and finite products use the recursively formed product sigma-algebra. The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates

Verification

Given: The hypotheses in the Definition.

1.1givenF1F2algebra

For each k, the displayed fiber formula expresses hu−1({k}) as a finite intersection. Each comparison set is the preimage of (0,∞) or [0,∞) under the measurable difference uk−uj, which is measurable by [F1] and [F2]. Hence every singleton fiber is measurable, and because Y is finite and discrete, hu is measurable.

2.1givenF1F3step 1.1algebra∎

For each y∈Y, the function x↦Mu(x,y) is measurable by finite maximization and subtraction in [F1]. For every Borel set B⊆R, its inverse image under Mu is the finite union over y of {x:Mu(x,y)∈B}×{y}, which belongs to the product sigma-algebra by [F3]. The error event is the finite union ⋃k∈Yhu−1({k})×(Y∖{k}), so it is measurable too. Thus the risk is defined as the probability of a measurable event.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources