How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Margin-preserving compression of score classifiers
Definition
Let be a nonempty measurable instance space, let have its discrete sigma-algebra with , and equip and its finite powers with their product sigma-algebras. Let be a probability law on . For an integer , write a sample as . A score map is coordinatewise measurable when each is measurable. Define its classifier by the least-index tie rule
and its margin on label by
For each , and each comparison set is measurable; an intersection over no indices means . Since is finite, is measurable on as well. The population zero-one risk is For a sample of length and , the empirical margin loss is The event defining is measurable by measurability of .
Fix integers and . A fixed-helper finite parameter codebook consists of a helper string fixed independently of the sample, finite nonempty sets with , a nonempty code set , and one coordinatewise measurable decoder score map for each . For , the empty product is the singleton containing the empty tuple. The codebook and all its decoders are fixed independently of the sample, so .
Let be measurable for the product sigma-algebra on its domain and the Borel sigma-algebra on . Let be measurable, where has its discrete sigma-algebra, and write . For , the sample-dependent trained score map is -compressible by this codebook on a sample if The code may depend on ; the helper string, codebook, and decoders remain fixed independently of the sample.
Definition references
Measurable spaces and measurable sets: a measurable space consists of a set equipped with a sigma-algebra.
Supervised prediction problems: supplies measurable instance and label spaces, a joint probability law, measurable predictors, and a measurable loss.
Population and empirical risk: population risk is the nonnegative integral of the loss, and empirical risk is its finite sample average.
A measurable function between measurable spaces: measurability is the preimage condition.
The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates: finite product sigma-algebras are generated recursively by measurable rectangles.
Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined: finite maxima and arithmetic combinations of measurable real-valued functions are measurable.
Arora et al., §2, Definitions 1–2: score closeness on training inputs with a finite code family and a helper fixed before sampling.
Shalev-Shwartz and Ben-David, Chapter 4 §4.2: finite measurable hypothesis classes and empirical/population zero-one risk conventions.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The measurable space , the finite discrete label space , the product sigma-algebras, the law , and a coordinatewise measurable score map .
Finite maxima and arithmetic combinations of measurable real-valued functions are measurable. Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined
A map is measurable when preimages of measurable sets are measurable. A measurable function between measurable spaces
The product sigma-algebra is generated by measurable rectangles, and finite products use the recursively formed product sigma-algebra. The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates
Verification
Given: The hypotheses in the Definition.
For each , the displayed fiber formula expresses as a finite intersection. Each comparison set is the preimage of or under the measurable difference , which is measurable by [F1] and [F2]. Hence every singleton fiber is measurable, and because is finite and discrete, is measurable.
For each , the function is measurable by finite maximization and subtraction in [F1]. For every Borel set , its inverse image under is the finite union over of , which belongs to the product sigma-algebra by [F3]. The error event is the finite union , so it is measurable too. Thus the risk is defined as the probability of a measurable event.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Sanjeev Arora, Rong Ge, Behnam Neyshabur, and Yi Zhang, Stronger Generalization Bounds for Deep Nets via a Compression Approach, §2, Definitions 1–2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Shai Shalev-Shwartz and Shai Ben-David, Understanding Machine Learning: From Theory to Algorithms, Chapter 4 §4.2 (standard reference, not scraped)