How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Online decision protocol
Definition
Fix a positive integer horizon , a nonempty action set , and, when choices or the environment are randomized, a probability space . An online decision protocol has rounds . Before round , the learner has the history consisting of its earlier choices and all feedback and loss information revealed in earlier rounds. It chooses using only and any learner-private randomization available by that time. In a randomized protocol, is a measurable random element of , meaning a measurable map from into equipped with its declared measurable structure. The environment supplies a real-valued loss function ; it may have fixed before the choice or choose it after the choice, as specified by the environment model, but the learner does not observe before choosing . The learner incurs loss and then receives feedback about round according to the feedback model. The history adds , the feedback received, and any part of explicitly revealed in round . No convexity, boundedness, or regret guarantee is part of this protocol definition.
Definition references
Random elements and real random variables: a random element is a measurable map from a probability space into a measurable space.
Elad Hazan, Introduction to Online Convex Optimization, second edition: §1.1, PDF pp. 23–24.
Tengyu Ma, Lecture Notes for Machine Learning Theory: §§11.1.1–11.2, PDF pp. 148–149.
Depends on
Used by
- Agile online mirror descent Algorithm
- Dataset Aggregation (DAgger) Algorithm
- Gram-matrix AdaGrad with full or singular diagonal metrics Algorithm
- Hedge Algorithm
- Projected online gradient descent Algorithm
- Adversary and feedback models Definition
- Bandit importance-weighted estimator Definition
- Contextual bandit protocol with finite expert advice Definition
- Finite stochastic bandit model, gaps, and regret Definition
- Finite-dimensional linear contextual bandit model Definition
- Finite-horizon imitation learning and expert-surrogate loss Definition
- Static, dynamic, interval, and strongly adaptive regret Definition
- A changing comparator separates static and dynamic regret Example
- Full-information finite experts Example
- Hedge with two experts over two rounds Example
- Exp3 expected regret under bandit feedback Theorem
- Hedge's second-order and static-regret bounds Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Elad Hazan, Introduction to Online Convex Optimization, second edition (standard reference, not scraped)
- Tengyu Ma, Lecture Notes for Machine Learning Theory, Chapter 11 (standard reference, not scraped)