How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
P local normalizer for normal complement theory
Definition
Let be a finite group, a prime, and a Sylow -subgroup (Sylow -subgroups of a finite group). On this page a nontrivial -local normalizer of means a subgroup of the form
where is a nontrivial subgroup of , that is (The normalizer of a subgroup, Subgroup). The quantifier always excludes : since , admitting the trivial subgroup would make the local statements below vacuous or false.
Why normalizers suffice up to conjugacy. Every nontrivial -subgroup of is contained in a Sylow -subgroup of , all of which are conjugate to ; so there is with and , by the conjugation automorphism Conjugation is an automorphism (Sylow II: in a finite group every -subgroup lies in a conjugate of any Sylow -subgroup, and the Sylow -subgroups form a single conjugacy class). Thus the family represents every normalizer of a nontrivial -subgroup of up to conjugacy, and the claim " has a normal -complement for every " is invariant under replacing by a conjugate Sylow subgroup. The normalizers are subgroups of by and are subgroups of .
Centralizers are named separately. The broader convention in the literature calls both the normalizers and the centralizers of nontrivial -subgroups -local subgroups. The two theorems of this page that are stated locally — the inheritance lemma Normal p complements pass to subgroups and p local normalizers and Frobenius' normal -complement theorem Frobenius normal p complement theorem — quantify over the normalizers only, so that is the meaning fixed here; centralizers (The centralizer of a subgroup) are never silently included. A normalizer of a -subgroup is itself a subgroup whose Sylow -subgroups are again to be read with Sylow -subgroups of a finite group and A finite -group has order for a prime and some .
Depends on
- The normalizer $N_G(H)=\{g\in G:gHg^{-1}=H\}$ of a subgroup
- The centralizer $C_G(H)$ of a subgroup
- Sylow $p$-subgroups of a finite group
- Subgroup
- Sylow II: in a finite group every $p$-subgroup lies in a conjugate of any Sylow $p$-subgroup, and the Sylow $p$-subgroups form a single conjugacy class
- Conjugation $x\mapsto gxg^{-1}$ is an automorphism
- $C_G(x)$ and $N_G(H)$ are subgroups of $G$
- A finite $p$-group has order $p^n$ for a prime $p$ and some $n\in\mathbb N$
Used by
- Frobenius automizer criterion for p nilpotence Corollary
- Frobenius normal two complement for S₃ Example
- Local normal p complements force control of fusion Lemma
- Local sylow conjugacy ascent for fusion Lemma
- Normal p complements pass to subgroups and p local normalizers Lemma
- Frobenius normal p complement theorem Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Paul Flavell, An Introduction to Transfer and Fusion in Finite Groups, §§2–5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Hans Kurzweil and Bernd Stellmacher, The Theory of Finite Groups, §§7.1–7.2 (standard reference, not scraped)