How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
PAC-MDP sample complexity of exploration
Definition
Assume AC, fix a bounded-reward finite discounted MDP, an initial state, and a learning algorithm whose behavior is a history-dependent policy. At time , let be the observed history ending at state . The continuation behavior is the tail of the algorithm's action kernels after , and is the expected discounted return of the continuation process generated from that fixed history by those tail kernels. Set and . For , the -bad-step count is where the count may be infinite. For and , a PAC-MDP bound is a specified finite function such that, for every MDP with these finite state/action sizes and every initial state, . This definition does not require the bad steps to precede a permanent stopping time.
For each fixed , the finite-horizon continuation values are measurable functions of : recursively, they are finite sums and integrals of nonnegative product-measurable functions against the behavior and MDP kernels. The kernel-integration theorem applies at each recursion, and the infinite-horizon value is the increasing limit of these finite-horizon values. Hence the bad-time sets and the extended count are measurable, so the displayed probability is defined.
Depends on
Used by
- A finite bad-step count need not be a permanent stopping time Example
- An inadmissible heuristic can suppress exploration forever Example
- Escape-event reduction for optimistic greedy learning Theorem
- PAC-MDP sample complexity of Delayed Q-learning Theorem
- PAC-MDP sample complexity of R-MAX Theorem
- The zero-tolerance boundary of PAC-MDP exploration Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Alexander L. Strehl, Lihong Li, and Michael L. Littman, Reinforcement Learning in Finite MDPs: PAC Analysis (standard reference, not scraped)
- Alexander L. Strehl, Lihong Li, Eric Wiewiora, John Langford, and Michael L. Littman, PAC Model-Free Reinforcement Learning (standard reference, not scraped)