Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableverified 2026-08-06 (claude-opus-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The product ∏i∈IAi:={ f:I→⋃i∈IAi ∣ f(i)∈Ai for every i∈I }

Definition

Let (Ai)i∈I be an indexed family (An indexed family (Ai)i∈I is a function with domain I; {Ai:i∈I} is its range) and write C:=⋃i∈IAi (⋃i∈IAi:=⋃{Ai:i∈I}, and ⋂i∈IAi:=⋂{Ai:i∈I} for I≠∅). By For an indexed family (Ai)i∈I the collection of functions f with domain I and f(i)∈Ai for every i∈I is a set the following collection is a set; it is the product of the family:

∏i∈IAi  :=  { f:I→C ∣ f(i)∈Ai for every i∈I }.

So an element of ∏i∈IAi is a function with domain I that takes its value at each index inside the member carried by that index; "function" is as in A function is a relation f with (a,b)∈f and (a,c)∈f implying b=c; f:A→B, the value f(a), domain and codomain.

Remarks

  • Nonemptiness of the product is exactly the Axiom of Choice. Nothing in this definition decides whether ∏i∈IAi is nonempty when every Ai is nonempty. That assertion, for an arbitrary index set, is one of the standard formulations of the Axiom of Choice, stated later on this page at The Axiom of Choice. The product formulation recorded there, that ∏i∈IXi is nonempty whenever every Xi is nonempty, quantifies over exactly the object defined here: it is this definition that fixes what the symbol ∏ in that formulation denotes, and what its elements are. What is decided without any choice principle is the degenerate arithmetic: the empty index set and a family with an empty member, both in ∏i∈∅Ai={∅}; if Aj=∅ for some j∈I then ∏i∈IAi=∅; and for I={j} the evaluation f↦f(j) is a bijection ∏i∈IAi→Aj, together with the families whose product can be written down explicitly.

  • Why the ambient set is CI. The definition separates inside the set of all functions I→C, so the ambient set must contain every function with domain I whose value at i lies in Ai. Taking C to be the union of the members secures that, since such a value lies in Ai and hence in C; and C is the smallest set that includes every member of the family.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources