How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Projective bundle in the quotient convention
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the relative Proj construction (The Axiom of Choice, Relative Proj of a graded quasi-coherent algebra). Let be a scheme and let be a finite locally free -module of locally constant rank (Locally free sheaves of finite rank). Write for the symmetric algebra of (Symmetric algebra of a quasi-coherent module): a quasi-coherent graded -algebra (Quasi-coherent module on a scheme) with , , generated as an -algebra by its degree-one part , and compatible with base change (Symmetric algebras are quasi-coherent and commute with pullback).
Definition. The projective bundle of over is the relative Proj with the relative twists , (Relative Proj of a graded quasi-coherent algebra). Since is generated in degree one, the degree-one part generates the whole algebra, and there is a canonical surjection the tautological quotient of the pullback of ; it is locally given by the coordinate sections of a projective space, over an open set on which .
Quotient convention. This is the quotient (Grothendieck) convention: over an -scheme , an -morphism is the same as an isomorphism class of surjections with invertible on , and the universal such quotient is the tautological quotient above; the representing property is proved as Projective bundle represents line quotients. The associated affine construction is ; the rank-zero case below displays its difference from over nonempty .
Rank zero. If then is concentrated in degree , its irrelevant ideal is , and the total space is empty. This is consistent with the quotient convention, because a surjection onto an invertible sheaf exists only over the empty scheme; the affine bundle is nonempty whenever is.
Remarks
- Frames. If over an open with , then with , so by the absolute case of Relative Proj of a graded quasi-coherent algebra; the tautological quotient restricts to the standard quotient whose components are the coordinate sections. The case gives a single degree-one generator and is computed on the paired examples page of this pair.
- Base change. For a morphism one has , because the symmetric algebra and relative Proj commute with base change (Symmetric algebras are quasi-coherent and commute with pullback, Relative Proj commutes with arbitrary base change).
- Base-change supplier. The construction uses the symmetric algebra and relative Proj only. The base-change bullet above rests on Symmetric algebras are quasi-coherent and commute with pullback and Relative Proj commutes with arbitrary base change. The former supplies the compatibility and the latter supplies base change for relative Proj; this definition is reconciled with Symmetric algebra of a quasi-coherent module and Relative Proj of a graded quasi-coherent algebra as written.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Constructions of Schemes, Sections 27.8-27.21 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea, 29 August 2022, Sections 4.5, 7.4, 9.3, 10.6, 17.4, 17.6, 18.2 (standard reference, not scraped)