How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Proper Forcing Axiom
Definition
The Proper Forcing Axiom (PFA) is the assertion that whenever is a nonempty proper forcing partial order and is a family of dense subsets of with , there is a filter such that for every .
The forcing order is stronger-is-smaller, so a filter is upward closed toward weaker conditions and downward directed: if , some satisfies . Replacing each dense set by its downward closure gives the equivalent dense-open formulation. Empty and finite families are included; for the empty family any singleton generated filter suffices because is nonempty.
PFA has the fixed bound . It is not being defined here as , and no value of the continuum is presupposed. The definition itself makes no selection; later uses work in ZFC plus PFA and declare their uses of Choice.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Cummings, Iterated Forcing and Elementary Embeddings, Definition 24.10, printed p.99 (standard reference, not scraped)