How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Quadratic tensor consistency test
Definition
Let . For put the tensor product of the two vectors, and identify with through the fixed row-major order of the index pairs ; for the tensor product is the unique empty matrix and both cubes have the single point . A Hadamard table is a function on one of these cubes, in the conventions of The BLR linearity test over F_2: and are fixed tables, and the tensor of a vector with itself is the matrix of entries .
The ideal tensor test. Choose independently and uniformly, query , and , and accept exactly when , the right-hand side being the product in of the two queried bits, equal to precisely when both factors are . The test uses three table queries and random bits; query points may coincide, and for all three points are the empty index, so the test reads the two single-entry tables and accepts exactly when . The rejection probability of a pair is , over the two independent uniform choices with the tables fixed.
Perfect completeness. If , that is , and , that is with the coordinatewise-modulo-two dot product of The BLR linearity test over F_2, then for all the distributivity of the dot product gives , so the test accepts with probability one and .
The self-corrected implementation. When the tables are only close to linear rather than linear, the test is executed on decoded values: each queried value is replaced by a two-query self-correction with auxiliary points chosen uniformly and independently, with and uniform, in the convention of Two-query linear self-correction. The self-corrected tensor test accepts exactly when , with independent auxiliary points ; it uses six table queries — twice for each of its two decoded values and twice — and random bits for the independent choices . The two tests differ only in reading the tables at auxiliary points instead of at the queried points; when the tables are linear the readings agree for every choice of the auxiliaries, since then and .
Remarks
- Why the tensor form is the right consistency condition. A tensor table claiming to encode is consistent with encoding exactly when ; by the displayed bilinearity the test at compares the two bits and , where is read as a matrix, so the rejection event is the event , a rank-one condition that Quadratic tensor test rejects an inconsistent tensor quantifies by the half-cube principle. The test is the quadratic analogue of the linearity test The BLR linearity test over F_2, applied to the product structure rather than to addition alone.
- Ideal and noisy parts are separated on purpose. The ideal test is a mathematical condition on exactly linear tables and its rejection probability is what the soundness analysis computes; the self-corrected test is the constant-query implementation available to a verifier that knows only that the tables are close to linear, and its additional error is bounded by the self-correction failure probabilities. The definition fixes the queries, the auxiliary distributions and the acceptance rules of both, and states no error bound: that is the content of Quadratic tensor test rejects an inconsistent tensor.
- Multiplicity and order. The coordinates of are ordered row-major and is indexed by that fixed order; the pair ranges over all ordered pairs, so an unordered pair of vectors contributes the two outcomes and whose tensors transpose one another. The product is symmetric in its arguments while need not be, which is why the ordered form is the one materialized by the tester of An exponential-size constant-query base assignment tester.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Arora and Barak, Computational Complexity: A Modern Approach, §18.4.2 Step 2 of the verifier, printed pp. 382-383. (standard reference, not scraped)
- Irit Dinur, The PCP theorem by gap amplification, §5 (tensor and consistency tests), printed pp. 17-18. (standard reference, not scraped)