How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Condition 19 and restricted additive-noise models
Definition
For a smooth bivariate additive-noise model , let be three times continuously differentiable, and let and have strictly positive three-times continuously differentiable densities and . Put and . The triple satisfies Condition 19 when there are with at which Here every derivative of is evaluated at and every derivative of at . The nonzero-domain condition makes both denominators in this formula well defined.
A finite additive-noise model is a restricted additive-noise model when every structural function is and every noise has a strictly positive Lebesgue density, and when for every vertex , every parent , and every set satisfying there is a value with such that the conditional law of given , together with the structural slice and the noise , is a smooth bivariate additive-noise model satisfying Condition 19. The conditional density is the ratio for the finite positive-density version supplied by the joint-density formula. The structural slice and conditional input density have the smoothness and strict positivity required in the preceding Condition 19 definition. If the model has no edges, the restricted condition is vacuous.
Definition references
Finite continuous additive-noise models and causal minimality
Strictly positive joint density and its finite conditional-density versions
Peters et al., JMLR (2014), Definitions 18/27 and Condition 19
Peters, Janzing, and Schölkopf, Elements of Causal Inference, §4.1.4 and Theorem 4.5
Assaad, Devijver, and Gaussier, course notes (2023), slides 22–23
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jonas Peters, Joris Mooij, Dominik Janzing, and Bernhard Schölkopf, Causal Discovery with Continuous Additive Noise Models, Definitions 18/27 and Condition 19 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jonas Peters, Dominik Janzing, and Bernhard Schölkopf, Elements of Causal Inference, §4.1.4 and Theorem 4.5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- K. Assaad, E. Devijver, and G. Gaussier, Causal discovery: noise-based methods, ENS Lyon course notes (2023), slides 22–23 (standard reference, not scraped)