Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Row and column stabilizers

Definition

Let λ⊢n and let t be a λ-tableau, with entries t(i,j) in the nodes of [λ] (Tableaux and standard tableaux). If n=0, there are no rows or columns; define Rt=Ct=S0={1} for the unique empty tableau. For the row and column formulas below assume n≥1, so λ1 exists. For a row i write Ai:={t(i,j):1≤j≤λi} for the set of entries in that row, and for a column j write Bj:={t(i,j):1≤i≤λj′} for the set of entries in that column. The sets A1,…,Ak are pairwise disjoint and partition {1,…,n}, and likewise the sets B1,…,Bλ1 are pairwise disjoint and partition {1,…,n}, because t is a bijection [λ]→{1,…,n}.

The row stabilizer of t is Rt:={σ∈Sn:σ(Ai)=Ai for every row i}, and the column stabilizer of t is Ct:={σ∈Sn:σ(Bj)=Bj for every column j}. Thus Rt is the subgroup of Sn consisting of the permutations that map each row set of t onto itself, and Ct is the subgroup of those that map each column set of t onto itself. In terms of the left action (σ⋅t)(i,j)=σ(t(i,j)), a permutation lies in Rt exactly when σ⋅t can be obtained from t by permuting the entries within each row, and in Ct exactly when σ⋅t is obtained from t by permuting the entries within each column.

Both sets are subgroups of Sn: the identity preserves every Ai and every Bj, and if σ and τ preserve each of these sets then so do στ and σ−1. Moreover the sets Ai are permuted onto themselves one by one, not merely as a family, and each Ai determines a subgroup S(Ai)≤Sn of permutations fixing the complement of Ai pointwise; because the Ai are pairwise disjoint and cover {1,…,n}, every σ∈Rt factors uniquely as σ=σ1⋯σk with σi∈S(Ai), so Rt=S(A1)×⋯×S(Ak)≅Sλ1×⋯×Sλk,∣Rt∣=λ1!⋯λk!. The same argument with columns gives Ct=S(B1)×⋯×S(Bλ1)≅Sλ1′×⋯×Sλλ1′,∣Ct∣=λ1′!⋯λλ1′!. For n=0 there is one tableau, the empty one, and Rt=Ct=S0={1}.

Remarks

  • Equal rows are still distinguished. The row sets are individual sets: each Ai must be preserved individually, even when two rows have equal length. The factors S(Ai) on distinct row sets are distinct when their common size is at least two; singleton row sets both give the trivial subgroup. This labelled-rows convention is what makes Rt∩Ct trivial: a permutation preserving every row set and every column set sends the entry t(i,j) into Ai∩Bj={t(i,j)}, since row i and column j meet in the single box (i,j); so it fixes every entry and is the identity, and Rt∩Ct={1}.

  • Relation to Young subgroups. If t0 is the standard row-filled λ-tableau, whose row i carries the consecutive block of entries λ1+⋯+λi−1+1,…,λ1+⋯+λi, then Rt0 is the standard Young subgroup Sλ of the next definition on this page; for an arbitrary tableau, Rt is a conjugate of Sλ.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources