How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Runge approximation on a plane domain
Definition
Let be a plane domain, let , and let be holomorphic.
One says that is Runge-approximable on with poles in when there is a sequence of rational functions such that every finite pole of lies in , the only possible pole at infinity also lies in , and
If is connected and , this is simply polynomial approximation on .
Remarks
The compact-set theorem supplies the local pieces of this definition. The next theorem upgrades them to a single sequence on the whole domain by choosing an exhaustion.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Guide to Cultivating Complex Analysis, Lemma 9.2.5 and Corollary 9.2.6 (standard reference, not scraped)
- M. Weber, Complex Analysis, Theorem 4.4.6 (standard reference, not scraped)