Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

S-integers and S-units of a number field

Definition

Let K be a number field (Number field), and let S be a finite set of nonzero prime ideals of OK (Ring of integers); only finite primes belong to S. Write vp for the prime-ideal valuation of a nonzero fractional ideal (Prime-ideal valuations on fractional ideals) and, for x∈K×, write vp(x):=vp((x)) for the principal fractional ideal (x) (Fractional ideals).

The ring of S-integers of K is

OK,S={0}∪{ x∈K×:vp(x)≥0 for every nonzero prime p∉S },

and the group of S-units is

OK,S×={ x∈K×:vp(x)=0 for every nonzero prime p∉S }

with the group structure inherited from K× (The units of a ring are the invertible elements of its multiplicative monoid, and R× is a group under multiplication; 0∈R× only in the zero ring).

No infinite place belongs to S. Only nonzero prime ideals, that is finite places, are admitted into S; a real or complex place is never a member. The archimedean places are already carried by the logarithmic embedding, so admitting them into S would count them twice. Consequently the rank formula of the S-unit theorem is r1+r2−1+∣S∣, with ∣S∣ the number of finite primes chosen.

The description via the fractional ideal is the one used below. OK,S consists of 0 and the nonzero elements of K whose principal fractional ideal involves no prime outside S in a denominator, and an element x of OK,S× is precisely an element of K× whose principal fractional ideal involves no prime outside S at all, in numerator or denominator. This intrinsic description, and not a localisation, is the one the S-unit theorem consumes; it also makes visible why S is a set of finite primes only.

Well-definedness

Put R=OK. By Clearing denominators for an algebraic number, every x∈K has mx∈R for a positive integer m, so K=Frac⁡(R). For x≠0, (x)=xR is consequently a nonzero fractional ideal: it is an R-submodule of K and m(x)⊆R.

The Dedekind property can also be established without Choice. By The ring of integers has rank the degree, R≅Zn additively, where n=[K:Q]≥1. Every subgroup of Zn has a finite integer basis (the finite induction in that theorem, steps 1.2, 2.3 and 3.2). Thus every ideal of R is finitely generated over R, so R is Noetherian. It is an integrally closed domain by The integral closure of a domain in a field extension is integrally closed. For every nonzero prime p, R/p is a finite domain by A nonzero number-field ideal has finite quotient, hence a field: multiplication by any nonzero element is injective on this finite set and therefore surjective. Thus every nonzero prime is maximal. Moreover R/2R has 2n>1 elements; among its proper ideals one of largest cardinality is maximal, and its inverse image is a nonzero prime of R. Together with the prime (0) this proves dim⁡R=1, so R is Dedekind (Dedekind domains).

To justify the local valuation without the Choice-qualified general invertibility theorem, use the local calculation in Integral ideal factorisation in a number field, in ZF, steps 2.1--6.1, with the nonzero integral ideal a=p. It proves that Rp has maximal ideal (π) and each nonzero element is uniquely uπk, with u a unit and k≥0. Its fraction field is K, so each x∈K× is uniquely uπj with j∈Z. Hence (x)p=πjRp, exactly the valuation used in the Definition. Changing π by a unit does not change j. Multiplication adds these exponents, inversion negates them, and vp(x)≥0 is equivalent to x∈Rp. Consequently OK,S is the intersection of these local subrings over p∉S, and x is a unit of that intersection precisely when both x and x−1 belong to it, equivalently all those exponents vanish. This verifies the ring and group assertions without selecting uniformizers simultaneously; the construction uses no Choice.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources