Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The inaccessible Lévy-collapse setup for Solovay's construction

Definition

Let U be a transitive model of ZFC and let κ be strongly inaccessible in U. For the real--ordinal definability form of the Solovay model, take the forcing ground to be V=LU. The constructible-inner-model theorem gives VZFC+V=L with the same ordinals as U. Moreover, κ is still inaccessible in V: regularity is downward absolute; κ and unboundedly many U-cardinals below it remain cardinals in the inner model; and GCH in V makes this regular limit cardinal a strong limit. The canonical setlike global well-order of L also makes every ground-model parameter definable from an ordinal. We henceforth write V for this constructible ground.

In V, let

P=Lv(κ)={p:p is a finite function, dom(p)κ×ω, p(α,n)<α}.

ordered by reverse inclusion. This is the finite-condition presentation of Coll(ω,<κ). For ξ<κ, put Pξ={pP:dom(p)ξ×ω} and, for a supplied V-generic filter GP, put Gξ=GPξ.

The restriction map pp(ξ×ω) is a complete projection: if qp(ξ×ω), then q(p((κξ)×ω))p projects to q, since the initial and tail domains are disjoint. Thus Gξ is Pξ-generic over V, V[Gξ]V[G], and the remaining forcing is the quotient P/Gξ.

No model or generic is asserted to exist. Passing to LU adds no consistency hypothesis beyond the inaccessible in U. Choice is a ground/ambient hypothesis: it supports the usual cardinal comparisons, maximal-antichain arguments and forcing recursion. It is not included in the eventual inner model.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources