How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Stable leaves
Definition
Let be a regular foliation of a smooth manifold (Regular foliation atlases) and let be a leaf of .
The leaf is stable when every open neighbourhood of in contains a saturated neighbourhood of (Saturated neighbourhoods of a leaf); equivalently, when the saturated neighbourhoods of form a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of .
More generally, a subset is stable in the sense of Reeb when for every open neighbourhood of there is an open neighbourhood of such that every leaf of meeting is contained in . For a leaf this is equivalent to stability of : if such a exists, then its saturation is open and saturated (each box carries an open set to its open plaque saturation, and finite plaque transport carries this property along every leaf), contains , and satisfies by the property of , so is a saturated neighbourhood of inside ; conversely a saturated neighbourhood of is itself a neighbourhood of every leaf meeting which is contained in .
Stability of a leaf is a neighbourhood property: it depends only on the germ of the foliation along , since both quantifiers involve neighbourhoods of . This is the property that the local and global Reeb stability theorems below establish under their finiteness hypotheses.
Depends on
Used by
- Finiteness of the fundamental group is sufficient, but not necessary, for Reeb stability Corollary
- A Reeb component has a compact boundary leaf with infinite holonomy Counterexample
- Compact leaves with finite holonomy form an open saturated set Lemma
- The Reeb foliation of the solid torus has the boundary as a leaf Proposition
- Local Reeb stability for compact leaves with finite holonomy Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Leiden NCG seminar, Noncommutative Geometry of Foliations (2023 seminar notes; complete PDF) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Danny Calegari, Foliations and the Geometry of 3-Manifolds (Oxford Mathematical Monographs; complete author-hosted PDF) (standard reference, not scraped)