How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Residual PSPG and grad-div terms for equal-order flow spaces
Definition
Let and have a finite cell partition . Let be a finite-dimensional vector space of continuous vector-valued functions, each cellwise polynomial, and let be a finite-dimensional scalar space of continuous cellwise polynomials with zero mean. Require all velocity components, their cellwise first derivatives and cellwise Laplacians, and all pressures and their cellwise first derivatives to belong to . Boundary conditions are stated with each application; the Stokes theorem below uses zero velocity boundary values, and the periodic example below uses periodic identification. The pair is equal order when velocity components and pressure use the same polynomial degree on each cell. On a cell , derivatives in residuals are classical derivatives restricted to the cell interior. For well-defined cell integrals, take , , , and parameters , .
For viscosity , reaction coefficient , advective field , force , and trial pair , define the strong momentum residual For test pairs , the full residual PSPG mixed form is with load . The grad-div addend in velocity tests is with . This definition alone asserts no inf-sup condition, pressure bound, energy estimate, or convergence result.
For piecewise affine velocities, on each cell. Therefore the standard P1 PSPG residual omits the cellwise viscous Laplacian of the exact velocity; this fact does not justify a pressure-accuracy or convergence claim. Such conclusions require separate consistency and stabilization analysis.
Used by
Dependency tree · 0 levels
Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.
Sources
- Felipe Galarce and Douglas R. Q. Pacheco, Fully consistent lowest-order finite element methods for generalised Stokes flows with variable viscosity, arXiv:2411.02100v1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Volker John, Numerical Methods for Convection-Dominated Problems, lecture notes, Chapter 5 (standard reference, not scraped)