How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Transfer homomorphism for a finite index subgroup
Definition
Let be a finite group, let be a subgroup, let be an abelian group written multiplicatively, and let be a group homomorphism (Monoid homomorphism and group homomorphism). Write for the set of right cosets of in (Left and right cosets and of a subgroup), and for each coset choose a representative .
The transfer. For the transfer of is
Two comments make the displayed formula a definition rather than a shorthand.
- Each factor lies in , so is evaluated inside its domain. The coset is a right coset of , with the chosen representative ; hence , because and represent the same right coset ( iff , and iff ).
- The product is well defined although the coset set is unordered. The index set is finite, and is abelian, so the product of the finitely many elements does not depend on the order in which the factors are written; the factor attached to the coset is determined by , , the chosen representatives and .
The definition of therefore depends on the chosen transversal ; the fact that it does not depend on that choice is proved in Transfer is independent of the transversal, and the fact that is a homomorphism is proved in Transfer is a homomorphism.
Remarks
-
Right action convention. The symbol denotes right multiplication on the coset, , and the coset assignment is a permutation of the finite set . The transfer is thus built from the right action of on its right cosets of , the choice that makes every factor lie in ; with left cosets the analogous factor is , where and .
-
Abelian target. Abelianness of is used only to make the ordering of the product irrelevant; the elements need not commute in a nonabelian target, and the construction is not made there.
-
Group-theoretic role. The transfer is the tool that converts information about the -part of into a homomorphism into an abelian quotient of a Sylow subgroup; it is applied in Burnside normal p complement theorem and Fusion control forces trivial Sylow intersection with the p residual.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Paul Flavell, An Introduction to Transfer and Fusion in Finite Groups, §§2–5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Hans Kurzweil and Bernd Stellmacher, The Theory of Finite Groups, §§7.1–7.2 (standard reference, not scraped)