Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Two-stage sampling laws and the expansion estimator

Definition

Use the PSU partition and fixed values from Cluster sampling units, cluster totals, and one-stage SRSWOR. A first-stage design has a nonempty finite support S1⊆2[M] and probability mass function p1, positive on that support and summing to 1. For each PSU i, fix a second-stage sampling design with nonempty finite support S2i⊆2Ui and mass function p2i, positive on that support and summing to 1. Given the selected PSU set S1, the second-stage samples (Si)i∈S1 are independent, with each Si drawn from p2i, independently of the identities of other selected PSUs. The joint law is Pd(S1,(Si)i∈S1)=p1(S1)∏i∈S1p2i(Si). It is a probability mass function: summing over the second-stage supports first gives p1(S1) for each S1, and summing these values gives 1. For a function g of the joint outcome, write E1[h]=∑S1∈S1p1(S1)h(S1),E2[g∣S1=s]=∑(Si)i∈s(∏i∈sp2i(Si))g(s,(Si)i∈s). For a first-stage function h, define Var⁡1(h)=E1[(h−E1h)2]. For a function g of the full second-stage outcome and fixed S1=s, define Var⁡2(g∣S1=s)=E2[(g−E2[g∣S1=s])2∣S1=s]. The symbol Var⁡2i denotes centered-square variance under p2i, and Var⁡d denotes centered-square variance under the joint law. These use the variance definition in Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space.

For the first stage, put πi(1)=Pd(i∈S1),πir(1)=Pd(i,r∈S1). For the second-stage design in PSU i, put πj∣i(2)=P2i(j∈Si),πjℓ∣i(2)=P2i(j,ℓ∈Si). The stage-specific covariance differences are Δir(1)=πir(1)−πi(1)πr(1),Δjℓ∣i(2)=πjℓ∣i(2)−πj∣i(2)πℓ∣i(2).

If πi(1)>0 for every PSU and πj∣i(2)>0 for every SSU, the within-PSU expansion total and the two-stage expansion total are defined by T^i=∑j∈Siyijπj∣i(2),T^=∑i∈S1T^iπi(1). No positivity assumption on the pair-inclusion probabilities is part of this definition.

Remarks

The product in the joint law is an explicit conditional-independence assumption across selected PSUs. A design with dependent second-stage samples across PSUs, or a second-stage law depending jointly on the first-stage set, has a different variance formula. The expansion estimator's divisions use only first-order inclusion probabilities.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources