How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The unreduced Burau relative homology module
Definition
Let be the Burau infinite cyclic cover, let be the complete preimage of the basepoint (a discrete countable set and a -torsor under the deck group), and keep the Laurent polynomial ring of The Laurent polynomial ring as the principal localisation of Z[t] at t. The unreduced Burau module is the relative singular homology with the left -module structure induced by the deck action on the pair and extended to by its universal property exactly as in The reduced Burau homology module.
Conventions. The second entry of the pair is the whole fibre , never a single point; integral coefficients are used; the deck action is on the left. The relevant invariants of the pair are the connecting map of the long exact sequence of the pair, landing in , and the relative lifted-edge basis fixed in The cyclic cover retracts onto the lifted flower and has a deck-equivariant spine model.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Burau cover with deck group , the discrete fibre , and the abelian group .
Every deck transformation is a homeomorphism of over ; it maps the fibre to itself, hence is a homeomorphism of the pair ; the deck group is a group under composition with and (Deck transformations and the deck-transformation group of a covering, The Burau infinite cyclic cover).
A continuous map of pairs induces with identity and composite laws (Relative singular homology, Functoriality of relative homology).
The cover is regular, so its deck group acts transitively on the fibre, and deck transformations act freely on the connected total space; hence is a -torsor. A fibre of a covering is discrete (Regular coverings, On a connected covering space, a deck transformation is determined by one point and the deck action is free, For a nonempty path-connected total space, a covering fibre is in bijection with the right cosets of the induced fundamental-group subgroup).
has the universal property that each unit of a unital ring determines a unique unital ring homomorphism with (The Laurent polynomial ring as the principal localisation of Z[t] at t).
There is a long exact sequence (Long exact sequence of a pair).
The relative lifted-edge basis of and the -module isomorphisms and are fixed in The cyclic cover retracts onto the lifted flower and has a deck-equivariant spine model.
Proof
Deck automorphisms of the pair and of . By [F1] each is a homeomorphism of the pair ; by [F2] it induces an endomorphism of . Since , functoriality in [F2] gives and conversely, so each is an automorphism and is a unit of with inverse .
The -module structure. By [F4] the unit determines a unique unital ring homomorphism with , and we let act on through it; becomes a left -module because is commutative. This is the same universal-property construction as in The reduced Burau homology module, so it involves no extra choice.
Conventions and invariants. By [F3] the fibre is the discrete -torsor , so its degree-zero homology is the free abelian group on the fibre; the connecting map of [F5] is the map used by the exact sequence of the pair, and the identification of with in [F6] fixes the relative lifted-edge basis of .
Depends on
- The Burau infinite cyclic cover
- The cyclic cover retracts onto the lifted flower and has a deck-equivariant spine model
- Relative singular homology
- Functoriality of relative homology
- Long exact sequence of a pair
- Deck transformations and the deck-transformation group of a covering
- On a connected covering space, a deck transformation is determined by one point and the deck action is free
- Regular coverings
- For a nonempty path-connected total space, a covering fibre is in bijection with the right cosets of the induced fundamental-group subgroup
- The Laurent polynomial ring as the principal localisation of Z[t] at t
- The reduced Burau homology module
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
66 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Joan S. Birman and Tara E. Brendle, Braids: A Survey (background on Burau matrices, the cyclic cover and absolute homology) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Vasudha Bharathram, Joan S. Birman and Tara E. Brendle, The Burau representation is faithful for n = 4, arXiv:2607.05283v1 (6 July 2026), Introduction and section 2 (printed pp. 1-5) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, section 1.3 (covering spaces) (standard reference, not scraped)