How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite rational residual-tube certificate for an ODE trajectory
Definition
Fix a dimension , rational times , a rational initial vector , and an ODE field represented by a finite acyclic expression DAG with rational constants, time/state inputs, and only nodes. Its domain consists of points where every division is defined. Write for the matrix of partial derivatives with respect to the state coordinates. A finite rational residual-tube certificate consists of the following exact rational data:
- A finite partition . On each panel , a vector polynomial with dyadic (hence rational) coefficients, whose neighboring endpoint values agree exactly. These stored coefficients define the actual reconstruction, including any endpoint correction or rounded stage value used by an implementation.
- For each panel, a closed rational state box , rational bounds , , a rational , and a polynomial radius with rational coefficients. The radius polynomials agree at neighboring endpoints. For a panel's finite rational subdivision, the intended inequalities are , , and .
- A finite rational subdivision of every panel, with exact endpoint coverage, no gaps, and pairwise-disjoint interiors. It supplies cells on which each required range test below is performed. Rational cell endpoints and constants are enclosed by directed outward rounding to finite dyadic endpoints before interval evaluation; an unrepresentable or overflowing conversion cannot validate.
- An initial check target with and .
The certificate is validated only if outward-rounded real-interval evaluation on every supplied cell proves all three radius/tube inequalities, the range inclusion in , that every division denominator in the field and its state derivatives excludes zero on the time-state box , and there. Here each supremum is replaced in the check by the maximum absolute endpoint of a finite outward interval enclosure; the residual expression is evaluated at the actual polynomial , so interpolation, stage, and storage errors already present in that reconstruction are included. Strict inequalities must have a certified positive interval lower endpoint; an inconclusive, nonfinite, unsupported, or failed test is not validation.
This format certifies only rational expression fields and polynomial reconstructions using the stated finite checks. It uses real intervals, not complex rectangles or balls, and does not claim an evaluator for transcendental functions or general library floating-point operations. The page proves the soundness of a validated certificate separately.
The finite DAG and real-interval conventions are those of Real intervals, complex rectangles and ball enclosures and Outward-rounded interval, rectangle and ball operations.
Depends on
Used by
- Finite checker for rational residual-tube certificates Algorithm
- Certified dense-output and reference-guard enclosure data for hybrid events Definition
- Symbolic derivative recursion for a rational expression DAG is correct Lemma
- A validated rational residual-tube certificate encloses an exact ODE solution Theorem
- Finite separated transverse events give an event-aligned hybrid trajectory error bound Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Donald Estep, A Posteriori Error Bounds and Global Error Control for Approximation of Ordinary Differential Equations, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 32 (1995) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ernst Hairer, course notes, Chapter III: Équations Différentielles Ordinaires (standard reference, not scraped)