How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Quantitative divisiveness for a finite forbidden family
Definition
A finite family of finite graphs is divisive if there are and such that, for every and every nonempty finite graph with and
there are a real and an -sparse blockade in or an -sparse blockade in , of length at least and width at least . The equivalent second alternative is a -dense blockade in .
The lower bound on makes every block nonempty under the existing blockade definition. It only removes the small-order case, where a singleton already satisfies the viral conclusion once its exponent is enlarged.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Nguyen, Scott and Seymour, Induced subgraph density IV, Section 4 (standard reference, not scraped)