How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A Borel representative from a random Boolean value
Example
Trace through the random-algebra Boolean value at the generic-real name.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the random-real name , and the homogeneous tail forcing . In the random-forcing language let say that the top condition of forces , and put .
Homogeneous truth about a generic real has Borel representatives: has an -coded Borel representative agreeing with truth on -random reals.
Verification
Choose Borel representing modulo null. If is -random, its ultrafilter on the measure algebra contains exactly when ; the random-forcing truth lemma gives .
Homogeneity makes the -Boolean value of either or . Consequently the actual tail-generic extension satisfies exactly when the top of forces it, that is, exactly when . Step 1.1 therefore gives . For a nongeneric no equivalence is asserted; those exceptions are removed only after placing them in the coded null set. This is a tail-forcing calculation, not upward absoluteness of arbitrary .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.