Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Boy's surface: an immersion of the real projective plane in three-space

Example

There is a smooth immersion β:RP2→R3 whose image is Boy's surface. The Bryant–Kusner parametrisation is given on the closed unit disk ∣w∣≤1 by g1=−32Im⁡w(1−w4)w6+5 w3−1,g2=−32Re⁡w(1+w4)w6+5 w3−1,g3=Im⁡1+w6w6+5 w3−1−12, followed by inversion in the unit sphere, P(w)=(g1,g2,g3)g12+g22+g32. The proof below shows that g=(g1,g2,g3) never vanishes off its poles, and that P extends smoothly and immersively at the three poles inside the disk. It satisfies P(w)=P(−1/w⋆) wherever the rational formulas are defined and P(w)=P(−w) on the boundary circle, so it descends to the quotient of the disk by the antipodal boundary identification, which is RP2, and it has injective differential, so β is an immersion; these properties are verified directly below.

Every immersion f:RP2→R3 has nontrivial normal line bundle: a global nonvanishing normal field n together with the standard orientation of R3 would orient the tangent planes by declaring a basis (v1,v2) of TxRP2 positive exactly when (dfxv1,dfxv2,n(x)) is a positive basis of Tf(x)R3, contradicting nonorientability of RP2. Assuming AC for the characteristic-class suppliers, equivalently w1(νf)=w1(TRP2)≠0 for the tautological generator. Boy's surface has no global normal side and has self-intersections: the three interior poles close to distinct points of the domain with common image 0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The disk D={w∈C:∣w∣≤1}, the polynomial D6(w)=w6+5 w3−1, and the functions g1,g2,g3:D∖D6−1(0)→R and P=(g1,g2,g3)/(g12+g22+g32) of the Example.

[F1]

A smooth immersion is a smooth map whose differential is injective at every point. Immersions, submersions, and constant-rank maps

[F2]

RP2 is the space of lines in R3; it is nonorientable, since RPn is orientable exactly for odd n, and it is presented as the quotient of the closed disk by the antipodal identification w∼−w of the boundary circle (the hemisphere model of the line space). This quotient has one cell in each of dimensions 0,1,2: its boundary quotient is RP1, a circle with one vertex and one open edge, and its disk interior is the open 2-cell. Thus it is a finite CW complex and is an admissible base for [F5]. Real projective bundle and tautological line, Positive-dimensional real projective space is orientable exactly in odd dimension

[F4]

A rank-one real vector bundle is trivial if and only if it admits a global frame, i.e. a nowhere-vanishing global section; for an immersion f:M2→R3 the normal bundle νf is the line bundle of the orthogonal complement of df(TM) for the Euclidean metric. A vector bundle is trivial if and only if it has a global frame, Normal bundle of a formal immersion

[F5]

Assuming AC, w1 classifies real line bundles over an admissible base, detects orientability, is additive under tensor product, and satisfies w1(E)=w1(det⁡E) (the cited proposition, Proof 4.1). The first Stiefel–Whitney class classifies orientability

Verification

1.1givenalgebra

Put d(w)=D6(w). Its roots satisfy w3=u±=(−5±3)/2. Exactly the three cube roots of u+ lie in the open unit disk, and all are simple since d′(w)=3w2(2w3+5)=9w2 there. Put A=w/d, B=w5/d and C=(1+w6)/d. If g1=g2=0 then Im⁡(A−B)=0 and Re⁡(A+B)=0, hence B=−A‾. For w≠0 their absolute values force ∣w∣=1. On that circle, writing w=eiθ gives C=2cos⁡3θ/(5+2isin⁡3θ), so ∣Im⁡C∣=∣4cos⁡3θsin⁡3θ∣/(5+4sin⁡23θ)≤2/5<1/2. Thus g3=Im⁡C−1/2≠0. At w=0 it is −1/2. Consequently g never vanishes at a finite non-pole.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

Write g=Re⁡h, where h=(32i(A−B),−32(A+B),−iC−12) is holomorphic off the poles. Differentiation gives h′=d−2(32iN1,−32N2,−iN3), with N1=w10−25w7−5w6+5w4−25w3−1, N2=−w10+25w7−5w6−5w4−25w3−1, and N3=3w2(5w6−4w3−5). The identities N2−N1=−2w4(w3−5)2 and N2+N1=−2(5w3+1)2 give 94(N22−N12)=N32, hence h′⋅h′=0 for the complex bilinear dot product. The first two numerators never vanish simultaneously: at w=0 both equal −1, and otherwise their sum and difference would require both w3=5 and w3=−1/5. Thus h′≠0. Its real and imaginary parts are orthogonal and have the same positive norm, so the real derivatives gx=Re⁡h′ and gy=−Im⁡h′ are independent. Inversion J(v)=v/∣v∣2 has derivative ∣v∣−2(I−2vv∗/∣v∣2), an invertible scaled reflection. By step 1.1, P=J∘g therefore has injective differential away from the poles.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra

At each interior pole wj, write u=w−wj and h=c/u+h0(u). The residue vector c is nonzero because the second numerator wj(1+wj4) is nonzero (0<∣wj∣<1). The leading term in h′⋅h′=0 gives c⋅c=0. Thus Re⁡c and Im⁡c are independent, orthogonal and have common squared norm λ>0. Set N(u)=Re⁡(cuˉ) and H(u)=Re⁡h0(u); then ∣N(u)∣2=λ∣u∣2 and g=N(u)/∣u∣2+H(u). It follows that P=(N(u)+∣u∣2H(u))/(λ+2⟨N(u),H(u)⟩+∣u∣2∣H(u)∣2) extends real-analytically to u=0, with value 0 and differential N/λ, which is injective. This verifies all three ends, including the two nonreal poles.

4.1F1F2step 2.1step 3.1algebra

For t=−1/wˉ, direct substitution gives d(t)=−d(w)‾/wˉ6, (t−t5)/d(t)=−(w−w5)/d(w)‾, (t+t5)/d(t)=(w+w5)/d(w)‾, and (1+t6)/d(t)=−(1+w6)/d(w)‾. Taking the indicated real and imaginary parts proves g(t)=g(w) and P(t)=P(w); on ∣w∣=1 this is P(−w)=P(w). Near the boundary these identities hold on a two-sided annulus, not merely on the circle. At infinity use the coordinate t=−1/wˉ near 0; the same identity gives a smooth immersive extension there. Thus the extended map on the Riemann sphere is invariant under its free antipodal involution and descends through the local quotient charts to a smooth immersion β:RP2→R3. The disk model in [F2] is a fundamental domain for this involution.

5.1F2step 3.1step 4.1

The three interior poles are distinct points of the projective-plane domain: their antipodes lie outside the disk. All have image 0 by step 3.1, so β has a triple point and is not injective. This is the Bryant–Kusner Boy surface; Karcher's source, PDF p.2, describes the three antipodal pairs of planar ends and their common image after inversion. The formulas above verify its immersedness directly.

6.1F2F4F5step 4.1algebra∎

For any immersion f:RP2→R3, a global nonzero normal field would orient each tangent plane by the sign of det⁡(dfxv1,dfxv2,n(x)), continuously and consistently. This contradicts [F2], so its normal line is nontrivial by [F4]. For the characteristic-class description assume AC as in [F5]. The ambient volume form gives det⁡(TRP2)⊗νf≅ε1, so [F5] yields w1(νf)=w1(TRP2)≠0. To identify this with the tautological class, represent a point by a unit x∈S2 and tangent vectors by v,w∈x⊥; the map v∧w↦det⁡(x,v,w)x identifies the determinant tangent line with the tautological line. It is unchanged under (x,v,w)↦(−x,−v,−w) and is a fibrewise isomorphism. Thus their w1 classes agree by [F5], giving precisely the tautological degree-one class.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

71 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources