How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A compact set in an infinite non locally finite realization still meets finitely many cells
Example
Let have vertices , edges and their faces, with weak realization topology. Every compact subset lies in finitely many edges although the vertex has infinitely many incident edges. An explicit compact subset is In contrast the set is closed discrete and not compact. For this countably indexed fan the conclusion for every compact subset has the choice-free proof below.
Source locators
Proposition A.1 p.520, simplicial specialization.
Facts & Assumptions
Stars and weak topology use simplexwise coordinates. Open and closed stars in a subdivision.
Verification
Given: The countably indexed fan with weak topology and, when proving the universal claim, a compact subset .
The two segments defining are continuous images of compact closed real intervals, so their finite union is compact. Its positive supports are , , and , exactly four open simplices in two edges. Any neighbourhood of intersects each edge in a relative neighbourhood of its endpoint, hence meets the interior of every edge. Thus is not locally finite.
Each closed edge meets in exactly one point, and the central vertex is not in . Every subset of therefore has finite closed traces on every simplex and is weakly closed. In particular is closed and discrete, and its singleton cover has no finite subcover. The numerical parameter tending to zero does not imply convergence to in the weak topology: is an open neighbourhood of missing all these points.
For a compact nonempty , the coordinate is continuous because it is continuous on every simplex. Let . This supremum is attained: otherwise the sets for positive integers would cover , and a finite subcover would bound all coordinates by for its largest index , contradicting the supremum. If , there is exactly one point of the entire fan with coordinate , namely , so this point belongs to . These points are canonical and require no countable selections.
If infinitely many are positive, the corresponding form an infinite set with at most one point on each edge, every subset of which is weakly closed just as for . It is therefore closed in compact , and is compact (adjoin its open complement to any cover to see this directly). Yet it is discrete with an infinite singleton cover, a contradiction. Only finitely many are positive, so lies in their edges and possibly ; if none are positive use the first edge to contain . For empty no edge is needed.
Remarks
Under Countable Choice the general result Compact subsets of an arbitrary simplicial realization meet finitely many open simplices supplies the compact-support conclusion immediately. The specialized maximum-coordinate argument above proves this countably indexed example without adding that hypothesis. The supplied instance and the noncompact set are explicit, rather than unspecified selections of points on the edges.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology (standard reference, not scraped)