How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A cubic image curve winds three times around the origin
Example
Let for and let . Then the image contour winds three times around the origin:
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The circle and the cubic polynomial .
The logarithmic-derivative integral equals the winding number of the image contour, and on a null-homologous contour it also equals the zero-minus-pole count (The argument-principle integral is the winding number of the image cycle).
Verification
The three zeros of are the cube roots of unity, so they all lie in . The function has no poles.
Apply [L1] to the circle . Since is null-homologous in and encloses all three zeros of , the argument-principle count is . Therefore .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- R. W. Howell and J. H. Mathews, Complex Analysis, §8.7 (standard reference, not scraped)