How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A slice of Set computed as a locally cartesian closed category
Example
Let be the function with , , and
Let have fibers , , and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The displayed finite sets and maps over and .
is locally cartesian closed, so each pullback functor has a right adjoint (Set is locally cartesian closed).
Slice objects and pullback functors are defined as in Slice categories, composition, and pullback along a morphism.
Verification
The dependent product has fiber over equal to and fiber over equal to . So has three elements in total, two over and one over .
If is the singleton fiber over , then is the singleton fiber over , and a map over is exactly a choice of an element of , namely . This matches maps over , which must choose the unique element over .
This concrete fiber computation realizes the pullback/right-adjoint pattern guaranteed by Set is locally cartesian closed, using the slice formalism of Slice categories, composition, and pullback along a morphism.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Emily Riehl, Category Theory in Context, 2nd ed., Section 4.6 (standard reference, not scraped)