How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A preadditive category with two objects and a nonzero hom-group
Example
Let have two objects with
and let composition be the obvious integer multiplication where defined and the zero map otherwise. Then is preadditive and has a nonzero mixed hom-group .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The category described in the Example.
A preadditive category has abelian-group hom-sets and bilinear composition (Preadditive category).
Verification
Each displayed hom-set is an abelian group under ordinary integer addition, except , which is the trivial abelian group. The chosen identity morphisms are the integers on and .
Composition is bilinear because wherever integer multiplication is defined it distributes over integer addition, and any composite involving is automatically zero. So the data satisfy the definition [L1], while gives the promised nonzero mixed hom-group.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Kiran S. Kedlaya, Solid modules over an ordinary ring, Section 1.2 (standard reference, not scraped)