How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A free group separates one nontrivial reduced word by a finite quotient
Example
The free group separates the nontrivial word by a finite quotient.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The free group and the word .
Free groups are residually finite (Free groups are residually finite).
Verification
The word is nontrivial in the free group .
By [L1], there is a finite-index normal subgroup omitting , equivalently a finite quotient in which the image of is nontrivial. This is exactly the residual-finiteness witness promised in the example.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Brian Osserman, Math 6112 notes on inverse limits and profinite groups (standard reference, not scraped)
- H. W. Lenstra, Profinite groups and Galois groups (standard reference, not scraped)