How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A simple function and its canonical representation
Example
On the Borel measurable space , the function
is simple. Its distinct values are , , and , with level sets
So its canonical representation is
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Borel measurable space and the function .
A measurable real-valued function with finite range is simple, and its canonical representation is the sum over its level sets. (A simple function and its canonical representation)
Verification
The function takes only the three values , , and , and the [given] corresponding level sets are exactly the three Borel sets displayed above. Thus is measurable.
Therefore [L1] identifies as a simple function and the displayed sum as [step 1.1, L1] its canonical representation.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Sheldon Axler, Measure, Integration and Real Analysis, Definition 2.88 (standard reference, not scraped)