How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A split coequalizer on a two-element set
Example
Let and . Define , let be constant at , let be the unique map, and put . Then
with and is a split coequalizer in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The displayed finite sets and functions.
A split coequalizer satisfies , , , and (Split coequalizer diagrams).
Every split coequalizer is a coequalizer and an absolute colimit (Every split coequalizer is a coequalizer and an absolute colimit).
Verification
The maps are , , , , , and .
Both and are the unique map to ; ; is the identity on and ; and both and are constant at . Thus all four equations in [L1] hold on both elements.
By [L2], the displayed fork is a coequalizer.
Directly, if satisfies , then for both , so is constant and factors uniquely through . This independently checks the universal property.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.