How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An edge inversion and its barycentric subdivision
Example
Let be a single geometric edge with endpoints and , and let the nontrivial element of swap and . This action inverts the unique edge of , but after barycentric subdivision it fixes the midpoint vertex and acts without inversions.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The reflected one-edge tree.
Barycentric subdivision preserves the tree and removes edge inversions. (Barycentric subdivision removes edge inversions while preserving the tree)
Verification
Before subdivision, the nontrivial element sends the oriented edge to the reverse edge , so there is an inversion.
After subdivision, the midpoint is a vertex fixed by the action, and each half-edge is sent to the other half-edge with the same orientation type rather than to its reverse. This is exactly the mechanism asserted in [L1].
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Yuriy Tumarkin, Groups Acting on Trees (standard reference, not scraped)