How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A one-dimensional BDI Dirac-mass extension
Example
Assume AC. In the normalized BDI convention , the strong group is . The finite matrices below give gapped one-parameter Dirac Hamiltonians , , and integer-labelled difference systems with every invariant . In particular a single negative mass against the positive reference is the generator. An integer invariant is constant along a continuous gapped path; the integer-labelled systems are not asserted to form a continuous path of changing index.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC and finite-dimensional complex Hilbert spaces with entrywise conjugation .
The normalized tenfold extension theorem assigns BDI index , subtracts the one negative Dirac generator, and identifies the resulting index-zero invariant with negative real multiplicity-rank difference (Tenfold real and complex Clifford-extension table).
Verification
Put , and . Direct multiplication gives , and pairwise anticommutation. On let be a real symmetric involution, , and . The kinetic term and mass are Hermitian and anticommute, so . Thus every has gap at least one.
Take and . Both square to and commute. Complex conjugation changes to and fixes , giving . Conjugating additionally by reverses both and , giving . Their product is the self-adjoint chiral involution. These are precisely the momentum-reversing BDI symmetries of the one-dimensional Dirac family.
The admissible real symmetric masses anticommuting with both and are exactly . Indeed anticommutation with makes the diagonal blocks zero, symmetry makes the other blocks , and anticommutation with forces . Squaring the mass gives . Therefore the reduced multiplicity problem is the actual real index-zero mass problem of [F1], with invariant . Rank is constant along an involution homotopy because the continuous idempotent has integer-valued continuous trace. Fixed-rank involutions form a connected real Grassmannian, so this invariant also distinguishes exactly the stable components.
For take , , ; for take , , . Use the zero-dimensional empty system at . The formula of step 2.2 gives invariant exactly in both cases. For , the negative mass against the positive reference gives , which [F1] sends to the unit of . Direct sum adds the integers and reversing the difference negates them. The entire continuous family in step 1.1 has the same invariant; no gap-preserving continuous integer jump is claimed.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Alexei Kitaev, Periodic table for topological insulators and superconductors (2009) (standard reference, not scraped)
- M. F. Atiyah, R. Bott, and A. Shapiro, Clifford Modules, Topology 3, Supplement 1 (1964) (standard reference, not scraped)
- M. F. Atiyah, K-Theory (lectures, notes by D. W. Anderson, 1967), with K-Theory and Reality reprint (standard reference, not scraped)