How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A two-by-two inexact assembly ledger
Example
Use Euclidean norm on and exact matrix/load Approximate it by The exact coercivity and continuity constants are and . The defect matrix is , so ; take the conservative certified , load defect , and . The perturbed solve is while . The transfer theorem gives the certified error ; the exact rational difference is also smaller than .
This is a finite algebraic error ledger illustrating how a certified assembly defect enters the perturbation theorem; it does not assert that this particular matrix is a panel matrix from a specified mesh.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The exact two-dimensional bilinear form, its perturbed matrix, the Euclidean norm, and the transfer theorem.
If , a matrix defect and load defect give the stated Galerkin error bound (A certified matrix defect transfers to a Galerkin error bound).
Proof
The eigenvectors and of have eigenvalues and , respectively. Hence and , so , . The defect matrix is diagonal with entries , so ; alternatively . Thus is a certified Euclidean operator defect.
The determinant of is , and its inverse applied to gives . The exact inverse of gives . Their difference is , whose squared norm is because .
The discrete space here is the whole two-dimensional space, so the exact Galerkin best-approximation term vanishes; , , , and . Applying [F1] gives which agrees with the direct rational check in step 1.2.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Francisco-Javier Sayas, First Steps in the Boundary Element Method (2015 lecture notes) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Martin Costabel, Boundary Integral Operators on Lipschitz Domains: Elementary Results (1988) (standard reference, not scraped)